📅 Ratings are automatically recalculated daily based on the latest GitHub data to ensure you always have the most current information.
Make Data-Driven Investment Decisions
Make informed investment decisions with our comprehensive analysis of cryptocurrency project development activity. Our tool analyzes GitHub data to rate projects based on development momentum, community engagement, and overall project health.
Unlike price charts and market cap rankings, our ratings focus on what really matters: is the development team actually building?
📊 What We Analyze
Development Metrics
Understanding a project's development activity is crucial for evaluating its future potential.
Commit Activity — We track daily, weekly, monthly, and yearly commit patterns to understand development velocity and consistency.
Recent Activity — Know exactly when the last code update was made. Projects with recent commits show active development.
Development Momentum — Is the project accelerating or slowing down? We measure whether development is gaining or losing steam.
Community Metrics
A strong community often indicates a healthy, sustainable project.
Stars & Watchers — Gauge overall community interest and popularity. More stars typically mean greater visibility and adoption potential.
Contributors — Evaluate team size and community involvement. More contributors often means better code quality and project resilience.
Forks — Measure developer engagement with the codebase. High fork counts indicate that other developers find the project valuable.
Project Health
Long-term viability requires more than just code commits.
Repository Age — Understand project maturity. New projects are riskier; established projects have proven staying power.
Activity Consistency — Analyze development patterns over time. Consistent activity suggests stable, professional development practices.
Team Engagement — Evaluate collaboration quality and code review practices that indicate a healthy development culture.
🎯 Three Complementary Rating Systems
We provide three different perspectives on each project to give you a complete picture:
1. Weighted Score (0-100)
A balanced approach considering overall project quality.
This score combines three key factors:
- Popularity (40%) — Community size and engagement level
- Activity (40%) — Development velocity and consistency
- Maturity (20%) — Project age and stability
Best for: Getting a quick overall assessment of project quality
2. Dynamic Score (0-100)
Focuses on momentum and current trends.
This score emphasizes recent performance:
- Development Momentum (35%) — Is development accelerating?
- Community Growth (35%) — Is the community expanding?
- Project Health (30%) — Overall project vitality indicators
Best for: Identifying projects that are gaining or losing traction
3. Risk Assessment
Evaluates investment risk level.
Projects are categorized into five risk levels:
- High Potential — Strong fundamentals and very active development
- Stable Growth — Consistent, reliable progress with low risk
- Moderate — Average performance with some concerns
- Risky — Significant red flags present
- High Risk — Multiple warning signs detected
Best for: Understanding potential downsides before investing
💡 Why Development Activity Matters
Unlike market cap or price analysis, development activity reveals the true health of a project:
Real Progress — Are developers actually building features and fixing bugs, or is the project abandoned?
Team Commitment — Is the team still engaged and working toward the roadmap, or have they moved on?
Project Viability — Is this project being actively maintained, or is it slowly dying?
Future Potential — Does this project have momentum and a realistic chance of long-term success?
Price can be manipulated. Marketing can be misleading. But code commits don't lie.
🔍 Data Sources & Methodology
All data is pulled directly from public GitHub repositories and updated daily.
Our analysis is:
- Transparent — Based entirely on verifiable public data from GitHub
- Objective — Algorithm-driven with zero manual intervention or bias
- Current — Automatically updated every 24 hours
- Comprehensive — Analyzes multiple metrics for a complete picture
We don't rely on subjective opinions or paid promotions. Everything is based on hard data.
📖 How to Use This Tool
Step 1: Browse the ratings table below to compare projects at a glance
Step 2: Sort by any column to find top performers in specific categories
Step 3: Click on a project to see a detailed breakdown of all ratings and metrics
Step 4: Compare multiple projects to understand relative strengths and weaknesses
Step 5: Check back regularly as ratings update daily with new data
⚠️ Important Disclaimer
Please read carefully before using these ratings:
These ratings are based solely on development activity and community metrics. They should be used as one factor among many in your investment research.
Always remember to:
- Do your own research (DYOR) — Don't rely on any single source
- Consider market conditions — Development activity doesn't guarantee price performance
- Evaluate tokenomics and use cases — A well-built product still needs real-world utility
- Assess team background and roadmap — Know who's building and what they're planning
- Never invest more than you can afford to lose — Cryptocurrency is extremely risky
Development Activity ≠ Price Performance
Active development is a positive sign, but it does not guarantee investment returns.
Many projects with excellent development activity have poor price performance. Conversely, some projects with minimal development have had strong price appreciation (though this is usually unsustainable).
Cryptocurrency investments are highly speculative and risky. Use this tool as part of comprehensive due diligence, not as your only research tool.